BUS/415 Unit 3 Quiz — Harassment, Retaliation, and Accommodation
Business Law
0
Attempts
0
Passed (≥70%)
17
Total Points
—
Avg Score
Questions (10)
The legal standard for actionable hostile work environment harassment is that the conduct must be:
A supervisor harasses an employee but takes no tangible employment action. To invoke the Faragher–Ellerth affirmative defense, the employer must prove:
An employee files an EEOC charge alleging race discrimination. The charge is ultimately found meritless, but the employer had reassigned her to a less desirable shift immediately after filing. Regarding retaliation:
Under the ADA Amendments Act of 2008, when determining whether an impairment substantially limits a major life activity, mitigating measures such as medication or prosthetics:
In Groff v. DeJoy (2023), the Supreme Court held that undue hardship for religious accommodation under Title VII means:
A key difference between ADEA and Title VII claims after Gross v. FBL Financial Services is that an ADEA plaintiff must show:
Which are requirements of a valid waiver of ADEA claims under the OWBPA? (Select all that apply.)
Under the ADA, an employer's duty when an employee requests accommodation is to:
Explain how employer liability for harassment differs depending on whether the harasser is a supervisor who took a tangible employment action, a supervisor who did not, or a co-worker.
Define 'essential functions' and 'reasonable accommodation' under the ADA, and explain what an employer must show to establish undue hardship.
Student Attempts
No attempts yet.